|
Good morning!
There's never a wrong time of the year to think about reducing
your taxes, so even though it's not December, or April, you
might consider…
"In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except
death and taxes."
— Benjamin Franklin (1706–1790)
"It is the right of every man to arrange his affairs in such a
way as to minimize his taxes."
— Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (1809–
94)
"We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes."
— Leona Helmsley (b. 1920)
Best regards,

Bradlee T. Howe
Financial Managers Trust
|
Taxing Issues
My first real encounter with taxes came when I
was 17
and spent the first of four summers working at
the
Raytheon plant in Andover, which was producing
guided missile
parts and sub-assemblies for the Department of
Defense.
Starting out in Production Control, I learned how to
develop
work orders, purchase orders, and job tickets for the
then-princely beginning wage of $1.37/hr., about
$8.25
today
(this was a while ago!).
I worked 40 hours a week, except during the month-
end
physical inventory, when we all picked up 16 hours of
overtime
for counting resistors, transistors, and capacitors.
So my
regular gross pay was $54.80 a week, increasing to
$87.76
with time-and-a-half for inventory.
My net pay, thanks to withholding taxes, was
something less
than that, but I had been told I'd get it back the
following April
— hence my initial understanding
of "tax
return." So the next 25 springs came and
went, and
even though I fully understood the folly of giving
Uncle
Sam an interest-free loan every year, I did look
forward
to my annual April "bonus" check. Clearly, I was one
of Leona's
"little people," working for a weekly paycheck long
after I
graduated from Raytheon.
Then I went into business for myself. I learned
to "arrange
[my] affairs" in such a way as to "minimize my
taxes."
Given a primer by legal and accounting counsel,
supplemented
by a subscription to the "Tax Avoidance Digest" (now
defunct),
I decided that part of being successful in small
business results
from hanging on to what you have earned by
legitimately
reducing your tax bill.
Five basic things that I have learned as a
business
owner about minimizing my taxes:
- Take advantage of the S Corporation or the
LLC
corporate structure if your business is closely
held. Unlike
a C Corporation, in most cases there's no corporate
income tax
— your income flows through to your personal
return,
which can be a significant benefit, especially when
you sell the
company.
- Understand the difference between tax
reporting and
financial reporting — you can keep two
sets of
books.
For example, as a service company, you may
have
accounts receivable at year-end, representing
uncollected cash.
At the same time, you likely will not only have
incurred, but
paid, your labor costs that produced these A.R. For
financial
reporting, you'll want to show the results on an
accrual basis
— revenues earned vs. expenses incurred for
the period.
For tax purposes, however, it may be best to report
on a cash
basis, deferring taxes on those uncollected
receivables even
while getting a tax deduction for all of the expenses
actually
paid by the end of the period.
- Don't keep increasing your salary in an S
Corporation
just because your company's profits are
increasing. Your
W-2 compensation is subject to taxation of 15.3%
(employee's
+ employer's share) on the first $90,000 of 2005
income for
Social Security and Medicare, a total of $13,770.
Above
$90,000, you'll pay 2.9% for Medicare (only) on each
dollar of
earnings — that's $2,900 on every $100,000.
The profits
of an S Corporation, however, are not subject to
FICA and
Medicare taxes, only to income taxes at your
personal rate. So
set your salary at a market rate commensurate with
your
responsibilities (lest the IRS ding you for being too
aggressive
in tax avoidance), take the rest as a distribution, and
save
that $2,900 on your total income package.
- Before you put your kids and your spouse on
the
payroll, crunch some numbers, especially if
they're not
actually going to be working. On payroll, you as the
employer
and they as the employed will each pay 6.2% in FICA
(not
Medicare) tax, a total of 12.4%. Alternatively, you
might
increase your own pay to cover what you distribute
to them
personally, off-payroll. Assuming that your salary
alone puts
you above the $90,000 FICA maximum, you'll save
the 12.4%
total FICA tax for them. [Caveat 1 —
See "Draining the
Swamp" sidebar. Caveat 2 — You will want to
consider
the difference in your respective incremental income
tax rates
before deciding on the appropriate course of action.
Caveat 3
— Not all reasons for having a spouse or
children on the
payroll are objective.]
- Don't trust yourself to make your own
withholding tax
deposits — get a payroll service. When
cash is
tight there's nothing like having some external
discipline and
thereby avoiding the stiff penalties for "failure to file
and
remit" in timely fashion. Knowing that you have to
cover the
looming tax deposit is a great incentive to get on the
phone to
collect those overdue receivables.
I was on the far side of 40 before I began to
recognize the
benefits, including tax advantages, of being in
business for
myself. Fortunately, I wasn't on the far side of 60.
But if I were
to reprise the whole thing, I'd have learned these
lessons
(not at Raytheon) while still on the good side
of 20.
Then, in arranging my affairs to minimize taxes, I
might have
rearranged my life…
For an update on Ben Franklin's comment, I am
indebted to QuotesExchange.com:
"There will always be death and taxes; however,
death
doesn't get worse every year."
|
Alligator Bites
The update on Leona Helmsley, "The Queen of
Mean:"
"…convicted in 1989 of tax evasion…[she]
served time for 18 months in F.C.I. Danbury. Now [2004]
an 84-year-old widow and the 247th richest person in the world
[Forbes], Helmsley still lives in her deluxe apartment
overlooking Central Park.
"Since returning to her big apartment from the big house in
1994, Helmsley has had a recurring role in the legal
system… [paying] more than $100,000 to her
former landscaper for breach of contract. And she has slapped
a $150 million lawsuit on the Woodlawn Cemetery in the Bronx,
where her late husband and son rest in a palatial mausoleum.
The cemetery is constructing an affordable mausoleum, large
enough to hold the remains of more than 2,000 people, near
the Helmsley site. Helmsley claims it disrupts the serenity she
was promised for her family's eternal resting place, and she
plans to move their remains elsewhere.
"While Helmsley now may be paying taxes as the little
people do, she evidently has no intention of being laid to rest
next to them."
— Megan Barnett
USNews.com, 8/16/04
|
About Us
Financial Managers helps the managers of smaller
companies and non-profit organizations develop
reliable financial information for operational
decisions.
On an affordable retainer basis, FM serves as
the
part-time controller and senior financial manager for
multiple clients, leading them to profitability and
positive cash flow.
The goal is for the organization
to outgrow Financial Manager's services, at which
time FM will take the lead in identifying and hiring the
right full-time financial person for the firm, and effect
a smooth transition to his or her management.
|
|
 |
|
EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION
|
 |
Enter your e-mail address here to subscribe to "Howe's Bayou."
|
 |
DRAINING THE SWAMP
|
 |
|
Having paid into the Social Security Trust Fund for
something
over 40 years now, and hearing the President extol
the benefits
of Personal Savings Accounts, I decided to see what
my
maximum payments for all of those years will do for
my wife,
Anne, and me when the time comes.
I discovered that in most cases, spousal Social
Security
benefits are based on the higher earner's
contributions over a
35-year period and are set at 50% of the higher
earner's
benefits, unless the lower earner qualifies for more
than 50%
on his/her own. On the death of either spouse, the
payout is
adjusted to the established benefit of the higher-
earner.
Then I tracked down several useful web pages
starting with the
government's Social
Security
Online web site to learn that, for example, for
people
born between 1943-54 who retire at 62 instead of
normal
retirement age of 66, the reduction in benefits is
25%.
Similarly, for those who wait until the maximum age
of 70, the
increase in benefits is 24%.
In the example given on the site, the annual payout
is $17,424
(age 62) vs. $22,488 (66) vs. $27,024 (70). Based
on a life
expectancy of 20 years after age 65, the total return
would be
$400,752 (62; 23 years of payout) vs. $427,272 (66;
19 years)
vs. $405,360 (70; 15 years). Even a 10% annual
return on the
earnings stream from age 62 to age 66 doesn't make
up the
difference in total expected value.
But perhaps only the actuaries among us make such
a decision
this way…
|
 |
PREVIOUS NEWSLETTERS
|
 |
|